Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed
Scott begins with a puzzle about people who move around, the swidden farmers, pastoralists, vagrants and runaways who have always irritated states, and turns it into a general account of how rulers make a population legible. Permanent surnames, standardised weights and measures, cadastral surveys, freehold tenure, official languages, scientific forestry and grid cities all convert tangled local practice into something countable from a centre, which is what taxation and conscription require. These maps do more than describe, because state power lets their categories remake the reality they claim to record. Disaster follows, he argues, when legibility meets three further ingredients: a high modernist faith that mistakes geometric visual order for rational order, an authoritarian state willing to impose it, and a civil society too weakened to push back. Collectivisation, villagisation and planned capitals are read this way. The schemes fail because formal plans quietly depend on the informal knowledge they suppress.
Scott, J. C. (1998). Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed. Yale University Press.