Home Blog Page 4

The Colonial System Unveiled

0

Simbi and the Coders: When Magic Becomes Automation

0

There was a time when coding was magic. The engineers, the ones who could summon logic from the ether, who could bend systems to their will—we were the wizards of our age. We spoke in tongues that the rest of the world could not understand, etched symbols onto darkened screens that made things move, think, come alive. There was power in that, a mystery, a wonder. Back then, if you knew how to code, you had access to something sacred, something few could grasp.

But magic doesn’t stay magic forever. Once, Simbi stood at the center of his world. The loa of water, knowledge, and communication, he was the bridge between the unseen and the known, the force that carried wisdom across realms. He whispered secrets to those who knew how to listen, poured understanding into the minds of those worthy to receive it. But then came the machines of a different kind—engines of thought, spells that no longer needed his voice to take shape. The magic still existed, but it no longer required a magician. The role of the sorcerer was shifting. The work of the conjurer was changing. And so, too, is the work of the coder.

The Changing Work of the Developer

The day-to-day life of software engineers is already shifting as AI grows more adept at writing code. Google said that over a quarter of new code there is already AI-generated. That number will rise. The question is not whether AI can write code. It can. The question is what happens to the people who once held that power.

I’ve watched as engineers, once the masters of the machine, are transitioning from writers to reviewers, from builders to overseers. They no longer shape every function by hand; they guide, they edit, they ensure that what the AI produces does not lead to chaos. They are not writing spells anymore. They are judging them. They are deciding what is worth keeping and what is not.

It is not that software engineers are vanishing. It is that their job is becoming something else. They are evolving into something closer to architects—structuring, delegating, ensuring the integrity of what is built. They are learning how to guide machines rather than simply instruct them. They are adapting, because to remain still is to be left behind.

The Last Human Skill

In all of this, one thing remains stubbornly human: alignment. AI can write code, but it does not know what should be built. It does not understand the friction of real-world needs, the subtle trade-offs of usability, the deeper implications of a well-placed button or a streamlined function. These things still require human hands, human minds, human debate.

I see it now, as teams gather in rooms, whiteboards covered in diagrams, designers sketching ideas in Figma, engineers debating over what the right approach should be. This is the work that AI has not yet mastered, the magic that remains ours.

The Future of the Engineer

I think often about Simbi, about what happens when the loa of knowledge is no longer the sole keeper of wisdom. Did he resist? Did he fear the machines that could conjure what once took years of practice to master? Or did he see the shift for what it was—an invitation to evolve, to move beyond the old ways, to redefine what it meant to be powerful?

I do not believe software engineers will disappear. But I do believe the ones who thrive will be those who understand that knowing what to build is now just as important as knowing how to build it. The coders who once worked alone in the dark, crafting their spells in solitude, must now become something else.

Not just sorcerers. Not just builders. But guides, stewards, architects of an intelligence that is still learning what it means to be intelligent.

That is the work now. That is the magic left to us.

Can We Ever Just Be? Black Identity Beyond the Shadow of the West.

0

Can we, as people of African descent, ever exist without the West as our measuring stick, our shadow, our perpetual point of departure? Can we ever shed the counters—counter-narrative, counter-plantation, counter-memory—and simply be? Not in pursuit of some imagined purity, not in the grip of essentialism, but in a space where our being isn’t always defined in opposition to something else.

it’s exhausting.

Toni Morrison described the problem beautifully but didn’t give us an answer: “The very serious function of racism is distraction. It keeps you from doing your work. It keeps you explaining, over and over again, your reason for being.

I think back to my undergrad years at Berkeley, where I minored in Mandarin. It was the first time I engaged with a language that held no ties to the West, no colonial fingerprints, no historical betrayals that I had to navigate. It was a liberation I hadn’t known I needed—to think, to express, to exist in a structure of meaning that had never been used to define or oppress me. Because the other languages I spoke, the ones I moved through with fluency, all carried the weight of empire. French, English, Haitian—each one, in its own way, a scar. And so I wonder, can we ever reach that place within ourselves? A language, a culture, a selfhood that is not in response to, but simply is?

This dilemma, this burden, is not mine alone. I witnessed it in the literary pages of Aimé Césaire to the streets of Harlem, where James Baldwin wrestled with the same ghost. Césaire, in Discourse on Colonialism, exposes the absurdity of European “civilization,” but he does so in the language of the colonizer, turning French against itself.

Baldwin, exiled in Paris, sought a freedom he was denied in America, only to realize that his Blackness followed him, that the West is still the frame, still the structure he must push against.

Even Chinua Achebe, in Things Fall Apart, presents Okonkwo not as a man simply living his Igbo identity, but as a man resisting—resisting his father, resisting colonialism, resisting the very forces that define him in negation.

And this isn’t just theoretical. We see it in the struggle for post-colonial nations to define themselves. Haiti, the first free Black republic, born in the fire of revolution, could never simply be—it had to be the counter to France, to slavery, to European supremacy. Its very existence was an act of defiance, and it was made to suffer for it. The same could be said of Ghana under Nkrumah, of the Negritude movement, of the Harlem Renaissance—all beautiful, all necessary, but all in some way engaged in the perpetually exhausting work of response.

Even in how we describe ourselves, the West lingers. We say Afro-Caribbean, Afro-Latin, African-American, forever tethering ourselves to some cancerous, cultural pus, something external that invades and attaches itself, as though our identity must always be a hyphenated affair.

Even in music—jazz, reggae, hip-hop, konpa—genres that emerged from Black innovation, the conversation is always framed in how they subvert or reimagine European traditions, rather than how they exist on their own terms.

So the question remains: can we ever just be? Can we ever arrive at a place where our culture, our language, our art, our very identity is not shaped by the gravitational pull of the West? Or are we forever locked in this dialectic, this endless negotiation with the forces that once sought to erase us? And if we can break free, what does that even look like?

Spirals in the Caribbean: Representing Violence and Connection in Haiti and the Dominican Republic

0

This conversation with Dr. Sophie Maríñez is less an interview than a reckoning for me, an excavation of Haitian and Dominican ghosts, of histories silenced and distorted, the way the past never quite stays in the past–“The past is never dead. It’s not even past”. She walks us through the troubled narratives of Haiti and the Dominican Republic—not as distant, separate nations, but as entangled siblings, bound by history, betrayal, and resistance.

At the heart of her book (and this discussion), Spirals in the Caribbean: Representing Violence and Connection in Haiti and the Dominican Republic, is the idea that history is not linear. Instead, it circles back on itself, shifts, adapts, repeats but never in quite the same way. This is Spiralism, a framework born from Haitian literature that seeks to make sense of the cycles of oppression, revolution, and return. The Haitian Revolution, the Parsley Massacre, the decimation of the island’s Indigenous people—these are not separate moments in time but echoes, reverberating through centuries.

Frankètienne, one of the fathers of the framework, said that Spiralism “…defines life at the level of relations (colors, odors, sounds, signs, words) and historical connections (positionings in space and time). Not in a closed circuit but tracing the path of a spiral. So rich that each new curve, wider and higher than the one before, expands the arc of one’s vision.” (From: Ready to Burst.)

Dr. Maríñez dismantles the neat, binary notions of identity and conflict. Hispaniola? That’s a colonizer’s name. Kiskeya? A myth born from a European chronicler who never set foot on the island. Haiti/Ayiti? One. the true Indigenous name, the other, rendered politically fraught by the weight of nationhood. She insists that there is no singular name, no singular story, only a mouthful: “the island shared by Haiti and the Dominican Republic.”

Dominicanidad, she argues, is no less complex. It is a construct, an essentialist shape-shifter, used and abused by political forces to serve shifting agendas. What does it mean to be Dominican, when the definition shifts by geography, race, class, and time? What does it mean to be from a place that has been “ghosted,” rendered illegible by the very scholars and institutions that claim to study the Caribbean? Ouch.

Let’s stay with the ghosts:

The massacre of 1937 was not just an act of violence but an act of memory, or rather, forced forgetting. The rhetoric of the “peaceful invasion” of Haitians into the Dominican Republic is not about immigration but about erasure, a convenient distraction from the economic and political structures that extract Haitian labor while denying Haitian humanity. The elite, the state, and the power brokers of both nations collude in this, enforcing borders not just of land but of belonging. And yet, the past lingers, history an apparition, unresolved, unatoned for, demanding reckoning.

Maríñez sees spiralism as a decolonized way out of the binary nightmare imposed by the Global North–a more liberating way to understand the history of the island occupied by Haiti and the DR, not as a series of conflicts between two nations, but as a struggle between those who hold power and those who resist it. It is the repetition of violence, but also the repetition of rebellion, of solidarity, of culture that refuses to be erased.

She calls for deeper connections, for a rejection of the cliches and stereotypes that keep Haiti and the Dominican Republic estranged. “We need to get to know each other,” she says. “Not just the stories we’ve been told, but the truths that lie beneath.”

And perhaps that is the real challenge she leaves us with in her book and this interview—to reject the easy narratives, to sit with discomfort, to see the spirals, and to break them.

Kenbe la / Aguanta ahi

book cover of spirals in the caribbean

Dominoes, Dictators, and Human History

0

Last night, the second installment of our monthly dominoes game was in full effect—just men, bonding, exhaling. The tiles slapped the table like punctuation marks in a conversation that wandered, as it always does, from the mundane to the eternal.

And then, like some specter from the old world, dictatorship crept into the room. One of the brothers wouldn’t let it go. Kept pressing. Kept insisting. The only thing that could save our people, he said; the only thing that could save the Global South, the Black Atlantic.

He wasn’t wrong—history nodding in agreement. But being right and being persuasive are not the same thing. One wins arguments. The other wins people.

I didn’t argue then. Distance has given me the time to process what was, in the moment, a fleeting exchange. I kept thinking of that old Histomap you see below—the grand sweep of human history distilled into a single visual, a tapestry of conquest and empire, of dominion and submission. Look at it long enough, and you start to see the pattern: for most of the 4,000 years that we have been arranging ourselves into groups, we have called our leaders kings, emperors, monarchs. Democracy, in comparison, is a newborn, still learning to walk.

So when I hear Haitians say, Bring back Duvalier, he’ll fix the gang problem, I don’t clutch my pearls. I don’t gasp in horror. This is what we have known. Not just Haiti, but humanity itself. It is the model that has governed us longer than anything else.

But what always gets me is this: when we speak of strong rulers, of iron-fisted governance, we rarely speak of some grand vision for our people. We often are speaking of solving something now, of the immediate, of the gang terrorizing the block, of greedy elites raiding the treasury, of the crumbling schools and empty bellies growling in the night. We want a problem fixed, and we often reach for the oldest tool in the box.

But dictatorships, as history reminds us, are blunt instruments. There is no fine-tuning option for the governed, no delicate hands to adjust the oppression dial to just the right amount. No, it is all or nothing. And once power is seized from the people, it is rarely returned.

But here’s where I land: I don’t care what we call it. I don’t care what structure we drape over the bones of a society. Just give me four things—shelter, full bellies, security, education. Guarantee me that. Do that from the bottom up, not the top down. Build a world where the people are not afterthoughts to power. Do that and you can call it whatever you want.

Rejecting the Tin-Cup Cycle of ‘Helping’ Haiti

0

A dear friend—well-meaning yet so profoundly detached from Haiti’s enduring wounds—asked me recently if I might leverage my connections for her church’s missionary project. In that suspended moment over the phone, a silent exasperation stirred within me—a private roll of the eyes that would have been impossible to hide had she been present. Her heart, undoubtedly tender and compassionate, bore the weight of a naive presumption: that Haiti exists in a state of perpetual need, a country waiting to be rescued by benevolent outsiders.

I explained, gently but firmly, that although my ties to Haiti run deep, many of us—those who have weathered generations of exploitation—are deeply skeptical of foreign intervention. Who, I wondered, could claim the right to determine how Haiti should be aided when such decisions are made in the comfort of American privilege? The wounds of our nation were not inflicted by the masses but by a select few who have hollowed out our resources and spirit. Haiti must, in its own time and on its own terms, reclaim its future without the heavy hand of institutions like the IMF, USAID, or the World Bank.

The disdain I harbor for outsider aid extends beyond Haiti’s borders. It mirrors the revulsion I feel when I encounter the spectacle of academic non-profits in the United States—organizations that parade their benevolence while perpetuating dependency. I cringe each time an online announcement proclaims that yet another grant from the Ford Foundation has filled a tin-cup for a Haitian nonprofit. It is as if another clanging tin-cup is offered to the world—a paltry gesture that underscores our persistent reliance on the generosity of strangers. How revolting it is to watch a cycle where genuine need is met with hollow largesse!

I ask myself: why do Haitians with means—of whom I know are many—not band together to fund and sustain institutions that truly serve our community? Why must we continue to lean on the empty promises of outsiders? Even more, there is an irony in the way such charity is delivered; behind the public display of generosity, there is often a contemptuous silence—a disdain for the very people whose lives are reduced to a statistic, a ledger entry for someone else’s quota of benevolence. Haitian nonprofits should be the creation and the endeavor of Haitians alone. No more handouts, no more token aid. If we cannot support our own institutions, then perhaps those organizations should not exist at all.

In the quiet spaces of reflection, I remain convinced that true liberation comes not from the charity of outsiders but from the fierce, unyielding resolve of a people determined to forge their own path.

The Road is Made by Walking It: Why No One Can Give You the Answer

0

People think wisdom can be bottled, labeled, and sold. They believe that a professor can give them knowledge, not just about a subject, but about life itself. That a life coach can unlock the secret to success. That inspiration is something you can buy by the hour. But most often, all you learn from a professor is how to be a professor. All you learn from a motivational speaker is how to work a crowd.

Lately, I find myself on the other side of the table—people asking me for advice, looking for the roadmap, the foolproof recipe. And I get it. There’s comfort in believing that if you just follow the right steps, you can sidestep failure, outrun the uncertainty.

But my journey is mine. I can tell you what I’ve seen, what I’ve learned, where I stumbled, where I soared. But I cannot give you a formula.

There is no universal smoothie that you can just gulp down and poof–you’ve “made it.” Forgive the mixed metaphors, but there is no magic blend of secret herbs and spices that will carry you to where you want to be. The road I took was not paved before me—I laid it brick by brick, decision by decision, failure by failure.

You don’t need more guidance. You need more doing.

A great teacher, if they’re worth anything, can give you one great thing. A single lesson that sharpens your instincts, refines your vision. And once you have it, lingering is death. You must move forward. (We can still be friends, but don’t put me on that pedestal in perpetuity. I’m no sage.)

So stop waiting for the hand that will pull you up. Stop seeking the map. The way is made by walking. Dive in. Take the hit. Let the world push back, let it test you, let it break you if it must. Because reality is the best bullshit detector.

By all means, dream. But let your dreams face reality. Mike Tyson said everybody has a plan until they get punched in the face. Another mixed metaphor: Let life be the sculptor that gives shapes to your dreams, let it chip away at what doesn’t belong until there is nothing left, until the true essence of where you need to be is revealed.

A dream that cannot survive the fire–one that bends, breaks, and is consumed under the forging–was never real to begin with.

The Code Noir

0

The Code Noir was more than law—it was a script for suffering, a doctrine of domination dressed in the language of governance. Issued in 1685 under King Louis XIV, it was not merely a set of rules but an architecture of control, regulating the lives of our ancestors, whether free or enslaved, across the French Empire. It was an extractive decree that sought to define Blackness itself—not as a birthright of humanity, but as a condition to be managed, disciplined, and exploited.

Articles: 1-5

Article I. It is our will and command that the Edict of 23 April 1615, issued by the late King—our most honored lord and father, whose memory remains glorious—be enforced without exception in our islands. To this end, we charge all our officers with the task of expelling from our territories all Jews who have established residence therein. As they are enemies of Christianity, we decree that they must depart within three months from the issuance of this [order], failing which their persons and property shall be seized and confiscated.

Article II. All slaves present within our islands shall be baptized and instructed in the Roman, Catholic, and Apostolic Faith. We command all settlers who purchase newly arrived Negroes to report this acquisition to the Governor and Intendant of the islands within no more than eight days, under penalty of a fine to be determined at our discretion. Upon notification, the necessary arrangements must be made to ensure that these Negroes receive religious instruction and baptism within an appropriate timeframe.

Article III. We expressly forbid the public practice of any religion other than the Roman, Catholic, and Apostolic Faith. Those who violate this decree shall be punished as rebels and enemies of our authority. Furthermore, we forbid any unauthorized religious gatherings, which we declare to be clandestine, unlawful, and seditious, and we order that such transgressions be met with the same severity as any master who tolerates or permits such actions among his slaves.

Article IV. No person shall be permitted to hold authority over Negroes unless they are members of the Roman, Catholic, and Apostolic Faith. Any master who appoints a non-Catholic to such a position shall risk the confiscation of their Negroes, and those who accept such positions despite their religious status shall be subject to punishment at our discretion.

Article V. We forbid all subjects who adhere to the so-called “Reformed” religion from interfering in any manner—whether through obstruction or discord—with the free practice of the Roman, Catholic, and Apostolic Faith, either among our subjects or their own slaves. Any violation of this command shall be met with the most severe and exemplary punishment.

Rituals and Resonance: Exploring the Tapestry of Haitian Vodou

0

The Land Remembers: Tourism, Legacy, and the Haitian Future

0
0

Subtotal