rasanblaj · the timeline · the library

Benin and Oyo are the two largest kingdoms in Africa

1440 to 1905 · span · African

The 1400sAyiti1 source
1440 to 1905 · Africanspan

Benin and Oyo are the two largest kingdoms in Africa

One lasted four and a half centuries, the other five, and both outlived the slave trade.

Read the full entryClose

The Oyo kingdom, in the territory of what is now Nigeria and formed by the Yoruba, was the largest state in West Africa that European travellers met. Oyo lasted from 1400 to 1905. Benin, its neighbour, lasted from 1440 to 1897. Between them they were the two largest kingdoms on the continent. These dates matter for Haiti because they cover the whole span of the Atlantic slave trade. The people carried to Saint-Domingue from the Bight of Benin came out of a region with functioning states, courts, armies, taxation and long distance commerce, and those states were still standing when Haiti became independent. Benin fell to a British expedition in 1897 and Oyo was absorbed into British Nigeria in 1905, within living memory of the American occupation of Haiti. The order that supplied captives to the Caribbean and the order that colonised Africa outright were separated by a century, and the same European powers ran both.

Yoruba OyoBeninWest Africa
Where this comes from Mignolo, W. D. (2011). The darker side of Western modernity: Global futures, decolonial options. Duke University Press. p. 4.
Permanent link to this entry

Meanwhile, and next door

24 December 1492 · Caribbean

The Santa Maria runs onto a reef on Christmas Eve

Losing the flagship off the northern coast forced Columbus home in one caravel with men left behind.

Read the full entryClose

On the night of 24 December 1492 the Santa Maria drifted onto a reef off the northern coast of Hispaniola, near what is now Cap-Haitien. A ship's boy had the helm. The hull opened and could not be saved. Columbus was left with one seaworthy vessel, since the Pinta had gone off on its own some weeks earlier, and the Nina was too small to carry every man back to Spain. He decided to build a fort out of the wreck and leave part of the crew in it. This accident produced the first European settlement in the Americas, and it produced it on the coast of what is now Haiti. Nothing about the site had been chosen. Rouse notes the practical consequence for the return voyage. Columbus sailed for Spain in January with a crew cut down to what one caravel could hold, and with a garrison behind him that he expected to find alive.

Christopher Columbus Cap-HaitienHispaniolaSpain
Where this comes from Source not recorded for this entry.
Permanent link to this entry
28 November 1493 · Indigenous

The Taino answer for eleven months of a garrison's conduct

Columbus came back to a burned fort and thirty nine dead men, and called the killing savagery.

Read the full entryClose

On 28 November 1493 Columbus returned to find La Navidad burned to the ground and all thirty nine men he had left there dead. The reason was obscure to nobody on the island. The garrison had spent the year seizing food, taking women and roaming the interior after gold, and the people whose country it was put a stop to it. Columbus filed the event under indigenous savagery and used it to justify what came next, which was war on the chiefdoms and the forced labour system that emptied the island. That interpretation stuck for centuries and it is still doing work. Whenever a colonised population fights back, the record produced by the coloniser reclassifies the fighting as the natural violence of the people being fought. Haiti met this again in 1791, when a rising against the most lethal labour regime in the Americas was reported in Paris and Philadelphia as a race massacre. The template was cut here.

Christopher ColumbusTaino people La NavidadHispaniolaHaiti
Where this comes from Source not recorded for this entry.
Permanent link to this entry
1685 · Pre-Revolutionaryyear only

Colbert's code forbids torture and the planters price it out

Replacing a worker cost less than keeping one alive, so the protective articles went unread.

Read the full entryClose

The Code Noir was drafted under Jean-Baptiste Colbert, the minister who built Louis XIV's navy and his colonial administration, and it reads like the work of a capable bureaucrat. Owners had to be Roman Catholic. Every enslaved person had to be baptised. Sunday work was prohibited. Torture was prohibited. Masters owed their people food, clothing and care in sickness and in age. Anyone freed acquired the standing of a colonial subject. The same code expelled all Jews from French territory overseas. In Saint-Domingue the protective clauses were treated as advice. The planters there worked from an arithmetic later called the planter's policy: an adult brought from Africa cost less to replace than to keep alive, so the cheaper course was to exhaust people and buy more. France could hold up its statute book as evidence that it governed like a civilised power while men holding its commissions ran the harshest slave regime in the hemisphere. The distance between the printed article and the cane field is where colonial power actually operates.

Jean-Baptiste ColbertLouis XIVSaint-Domingue planters FranceSaint-Domingue
Where this comes from Source not recorded for this entry.
Permanent link to this entry

Back to the whole chronology