Bobadilla arrived as royal governor in August 1500 and ended the family's grant of the colony.
›Read the full entryClose
Francisco de Bobadilla landed at Santo Domingo on 23 August 1500 carrying a royal commission as governor. Within weeks he had arrested Christopher Columbus and his brothers, put them in irons and shipped them back to Spain. The charges concerned their conduct of the colony, including the hanging of Spanish settlers who had rebelled against them. Rouse treats the arrest as an administrative event, which is what it was. The crown had granted the Columbus family extraordinary hereditary rights over whatever they found, and eight years of complaint from settlers persuaded Ferdinand and Isabella that a private concession was the wrong way to run a possession that was starting to yield gold. Direct royal government replaced the family grant. The pattern held in the Caribbean for four centuries. A private venture opens a territory, the venture turns lucrative or embarrassing or both, and the state takes it over. France did the same to its own chartered companies in Saint-Domingue.
Francisco de BobadillaChristopher ColumbusFerdinand of AragonIsabella of CastileSanto DomingoSpainSaint-Domingue
The sixteenth to the nineteenth century · Africanspan
Two in five people shipped across the Atlantic came from Kongo and Angola
The region was nowhere near two fifths of Africa's population.
›Read the full entryClose
An estimated forty per cent of all the people carried across the Atlantic as slaves came from the Kongo and Angola region, a share far out of proportion to how many people lived there. One reason is that this was the only stretch of the coast where Europeans went inland themselves to seize captives directly instead of buying them from African traders at the shore. That method killed many more people in the taking, though by the height of the trade in the eighteenth century African entrepreneurs were running the inland end of it. The large functioning states that existed on this coast in the early sixteenth century were replaced by smaller and more frightened ones, and the region went backwards socially and politically for centuries. Europeans liked to describe Africans as cannibals. Africans watching neighbours carried off by the tens of thousands to an unexplained destination came to say the same thing about Europeans.
Tawantinsuyu and Anahuac were intact when the Spaniards arrived
The world of 1500 had many centres and no single one imposed itself on the rest.
›Read the full entryClose
Around 1500 the world was polycentric and not yet capitalist. Several civilisations coexisted, some ancient and some newly formed. In China the Ming had ruled since 1368 and would rule until 1644. Three sultanates had emerged out of the Islamic caliphates, the Ottoman with its centre at Constantinople, the Safavid at Baku, and the Mughal, which ran from 1526 to 1707. In 1520 the Muscovites expelled the Golden Horde and declared Moscow the third Rome. In the Americas the Inca in Tawantinsuyu and the Aztecs in Anahuac were both sophisticated civilisations at the moment the Spaniards landed. No single centre imposed itself on all the others, and conflicts stayed local because there was no reference point against which alternatives had to be measured. Within a century Tawantinsuyu and Anahuac had been dismantled, the Maya were already in decline, and the Atlantic had become the axis around which the rest of the planet was arranged.
The year usually given for the official entry of African slaves into Hispaniola
Africans had already crossed with Columbus ten years before the date the records prefer.
›Read the full entryClose
In 1492 an Italian navigator sailing for Spain reached a green Caribbean island and named it La Isla Espanola. Africans came to the Americas on that first voyage, but the year normally cited as the official entry of African slaves into Hispaniola is 1502. They were taken from villages and cities along the Gulf of Guinea and brought in to replace the Taino and Arawak, whom the Spanish had subjugated and enslaved and who were disappearing fast. Fleurant's point about what arrived with them is precise. They carried their religion, and the religion carried the historical memory of where they had come from, preserved in a form that could survive transport. A people can be stripped of language, lineage and name and still keep a working account of its own origin, provided the account is lodged in ritual rather than in writing. That is what happened on this island.
Taino and Arawak peopleHispaniolaGulf of Guinea
Where this comes fromSource not recorded for this entry.