rasanblaj · the timeline · the library

In Kongo, dancing a war dance was the phrase used for declaring war

1622 to 1781 · span · African

The 1600sMaafa1 source
1622 to 1781 · Africanspan

In Kongo, dancing a war dance was the phrase used for declaring war

European writers in Africa recorded sangamento as a formal act of state, not a celebration.

Read the full entryClose

A Jesuit report of January 1622 on a Kongo rebellion uses the word sangamento, dancing a war dance, as the ordinary expression for going to war. Seventeenth century writers in the kingdom, Africans and Europeans alike, treated the phrase as a synonym for the decision itself. The dancing was training. Where battles were settled by swords and axes at close quarters, dancing quickened reflexes and taught men to parry, doing the work that drill did in European armies. After 1680, when muskets took over and fighting was done at a distance, the practice survived. Luca da Caltanisetta watched the musketeer army of the prince of Nsoyo dance before war in 1691, and Rafael de Castello de Vide saw the same thing ninety years later, in 1781. European and colonial forces of the period marched, drummed and carried flags. They did not dance. When the rebels at Stono in South Carolina stopped in a field in 1739 to dance and beat drums, they were doing something an English colonist had no framework for reading.

Mateus CardosoLuca da CaltanisettaRafael de Castello de Vide KongoNsoyoSouth Carolina
Where this comes from Thornton, J. K. (1991). African dimensions of the Stono Rebellion. p. 1112.
Permanent link to this entry

Meanwhile, and next door

March 1685 · Pre-Revolutionarymonth known

The Code Noir puts slavery into French law

Sixty articles on masters, baptism, punishment, rations and the status of children.

Read the full entryClose

In March 1685 the French crown issued the edict known as the Code Noir. Its sixty articles set out how enslaved people in the French colonies were to be held, fed, clothed, punished, married, baptised and buried. It required conversion to Catholicism and expelled Jews from the colonies. It defined the enslaved as movable property while also treating them as persons capable of crime and of religious duty, a contradiction the colonial courts spent a century managing. It fixed that a child followed the condition of its mother, which made every child born to an enslaved woman the property of her owner and made rape profitable. It placed some limits on masters, requiring rations and clothing and forbidding certain killings, and enforcement of those limits was rare. The edict framed French colonial slavery until 1848. Saint-Domingue was the colony where it governed the most people, and the people it governed there ended it themselves in 1793.

French crownLouis XIV FranceSaint-Domingue
Where this comes from Source not recorded for this entry.
Permanent link to this entry
20 September 1697 · Caribbean

Louis XIV and William III trade an island neither of them had seen

One third of one Caribbean island would out-earn the whole eastern seaboard of North America.

Read the full entryClose

Louis XIV of France and William III of England closed their war in 1697 by exchanging territory neither of them had ever seen. The Treaty of Ryswick was a general settlement covering Europe, North America and the Caribbean, and among its terms Spain gave up the western third of Hispaniola to France. Spain had held nominal title to the whole island for two centuries and had governed the western end of it hardly at all, its own settlers having withdrawn eastward long before. France received the piece that turned out to matter. Over the following century Saint-Domingue produced revenue on a scale that is hard to state without sounding careless. By the 1780s the colony was worth more to France, in trade and customs receipts, than the thirteen British colonies of North America were worth to Britain. One third of one Caribbean island out-earned the eastern seaboard of a continent. That is the wealth the enslaved population created, and it is the wealth they carried out of the empire with them.

Louis XIVWilliam IIISpainFrance HispaniolaSaint-DomingueFranceEngland
Where this comes from Source not recorded for this entry.
Permanent link to this entry
31 December 1640 · Diaspora

A sale ledger in Dutch Brazil prices captives ten at a time

Buyers, lots and totals in guilders, written down on the last day of the year.

Read the full entryClose

On the last day of 1640 a public sale in Dutch Brazil was written up line by line. The captives had arrived on the Wapen van Delf and had been taken at Guinea, at Ardra on the Slave Coast and at Calabar in the Niger delta. The clerk recorded who bought what. Gaspar Dias Ferreira took several lots of ten people, paying between 161 and 205 patacas a head. Moses Netto, Simon van der Neese and Jacob Aboaff appear as purchasers alongside him. Some lots ran past five thousand guilders. The document survives because the Dutch West India Company kept proper accounts, and it is worth more than a hundred pages of description: it names the buyers, fixes the prices, and shows a market in northeastern Brazil where Dutch and Sephardic merchants dealt in human beings by the batch of ten. Not one of the people sold that day is named. The ledger preserves the side of the transaction that somebody expected to need later.

Gaspar Dias FerreiraMoses NettoSimon van der NeeseJacob AboaffDutch West India Company BrazilGuineaArdraCalabar
Where this comes from Source not recorded for this entry.
Permanent link to this entry

Back to the whole chronology