20 June 1793 · Haitian
Popkin credits white sailors with setting emancipation in motion
›Read the full entryClose
Joseph gives extended space to Jeremy Popkin's argument, which he calls a departure from traditional scholarship on 1793. Popkin holds that the events at Cap-Francois in that year, including the burning of the city, are conventionally credited to the resistance of the enslaved and to French revolutionary principles of rights and equality, and that this rests on overly determinist narratives. His own claim is that the individuals who set the events of 20 June 1793 in motion were neither Black insurgents fighting for freedom nor white colonists defending privilege, but white sailors from outside the island and a white general who believed he was defending the interests of revolutionary France. On that reading the emancipation proclamations of 1793 and the Convention's decree of 1794 came about through a crisis that had little to do with slavery, and Popkin stresses the difference between urban and rural slavery. Where this account departs from the standard one: Reports Popkin's contention that the 1793 emancipation proclamations resulted from a contingent urban crisis rather than from organised insurgent pressure or abolitionist campaigning.