rasanblaj · the timeline · the library

A law makes the colonies equal and the field workers voteless

1 January 1798 · Haitian

The 1700sThe Great Reclamation1 source
1 January 1798 · Haitian

A law makes the colonies equal and the field workers voteless

Active citizenship requires battle service, some property, or an electoral contribution.

Read the full entryClose

Fick traces what happened to universal citizenship after Thermidor. The Directory's Constitution of Year 3 declared the colonies integral parts of the nation subject to the same laws, which in principle safeguarded emancipation, but the colonialist faction of the Societe de Clichy had been working to overturn the decree of 4 February 1794 since it passed, and the elections of 1796 and 1797 gave royalists a majority in both councils. Only the coup of 18 Fructidor purged them. The pro-emancipation coalition that survived, including Sonthonax and Laveaux, then carried the Law on the Organization of the Colonies on 1 January 1798. Fick's point is what it left out: active citizenship applied only to those who could show battle service for the Republic, owned some property or paid an electoral contribution, which excluded the African-born majority who worked the fields.

Abbe GregoireEtienne LaveauxLeger-Felicite Sonthonax ParisSaint-Domingue
Where this comes from Fick, C. E. (2007). The Haitian Revolution and the limits of freedom: Defining citizenship in the revolutionary era. p. 408.in the library
Permanent link to this entry

Meanwhile, and next door

1798 to 1800 · Diasporaspan

Jefferson pays an enslaved doctor twice and then hunts a conjuror

Four unexplained deaths at Monticello, one practitioner, and a prosecution that failed.

Read the full entryClose

Thomas Jefferson twice paid for the services of an enslaved healer known as Perkins's Sam, in November 1798 and August 1799, to attend George and George Junior at Monticello during illnesses nobody could explain. Those were the only two occasions on which he paid an enslaved practitioner at all, though he regularly bought medicine from white ones. Four unusual deaths occurred in that household in these years, and Sam was very likely the practitioner in each. In January and April 1800 letters within the family discuss the same negro doctor who attended the Georges, this time in connection with an attempt to prosecute a conjuror for poisoning other enslaved people. The accused ran away before he could be arrested. A second attempt on Jefferson's properties in 1819 ended in acquittal for want of evidence. Wealthy Virginians called such practitioners in for afflictions they could not name and prosecuted them for the same power.

Thomas JeffersonPerkins's Sam MonticelloVirginia
Where this comes from Source not recorded for this entry.
Permanent link to this entry
1796 to 1797 · Caribbeanspan

Half the Caribs deported to Balliceaux never left it

Of 4,338 sent to the small island, 2,248 survived to be shipped on to Honduras.

Read the full entryClose

Starvation ended the Second Carib War. The British had worked out that destroying the hidden provision grounds would do what pursuit could not, and the survivors who came down from the mountains were described by the botanist Alexander Anderson as a spectacle of misery. Britain then decided to remove them from St Vincent altogether. They were shipped first to Balliceaux, a small island nearby, where roughly half of them died under British military supervision, probably of continued famine together with yellow fever or some similar epidemic. Nancie Gonzalez counts 4,338 deported to Balliceaux and 2,248 alive to make the onward voyage to Roatan, an island off the coast of Honduras. Years later a Guatemalan envoy, Jose Rossi y Rubi, came to Roatan to negotiate resettlement on the Central American mainland and asked one of their leaders where his loyalties lay. The man answered that he commanded in nobody's name and was a Carib subordinate to no one.

Alexander AndersonJose Rossi y RubiCaribs of St Vincent St VincentBalliceauxRoatanHonduras
Where this comes from Source not recorded for this entry.
Permanent link to this entry
1797 · Pre-Revolutionaryyear only

The word vaudou enters a colonial decree for the first time

Sonthonax banned the meetings by name, and Toussaint banned them again three years later.

Read the full entryClose

Colonial law in Saint Domingue said very little about the religious practices of the enslaved. Through the eighteenth century it forbade dances and night gatherings over and over, leaving the name of the religion out of the text. That changed in 1797, when the French civil commissioner Leger Felicite Sonthonax prohibited vaudou meetings by name. Sonthonax was the official who had proclaimed general emancipation in the North four years earlier. In 1800 Toussaint Louverture repeated the prohibition and widened it to cover all night gatherings, and the reason recorded at the time was that such meetings were carrying talk of massacring the anciens libres, the people of colour who had been free before the revolution. By 1803 a colonist was describing vaudou as an obscene dance used to encourage murder. Leaders who had come out of the plantations themselves were now policing the ceremonies their own soldiers attended.

Leger Felicite SonthonaxToussaint Louverture Saint Domingue
Where this comes from Source not recorded for this entry.
Permanent link to this entry

Back to the whole chronology