Toussaint outlaws small land sales to stop workers leaving
6 February 1801 · Haitian
The 1800sThe Great Reclamation1 source
6 February 1801 · Haitian
Toussaint outlaws small land sales to stop workers leaving
Large sales need his personal authorisation, because cultivators were buying land and leaving.
›Read the full entryClose
Stein treats this order as the sharpest statement of the gap between rulers and workers in the whole revolution. On 6 February 1801 Toussaint addressed what he considered the problem of individual cultivators acquiring small properties and leaving the estates. Cultivation in the colony, he proclaimed, required the union of considerable quantities of men and money, and everything had to be done to keep the plantations working, above all to overcome the shortage of hands. He therefore prohibited all sales of small parcels and ruled that sales of larger ones required official and ultimately his own personal authorisation. Stein's inference is that he had to outlaw the practice because it was happening constantly. After a decade of revolution the freed people's goal had clarified: liberty meant freedom from the plantation and ownership of their own land, which Toussaint could not grant.
Prisoners are stripped of their uniforms and dressed as new arrivals
Spanish officials at Cartagena and Caracas saw through the disguise and turned the ships away.
›Read the full entryClose
In July 1802 the French general Antoine Richepance began deporting the people he had captured while retaking Guadeloupe for Napoleon Bonaparte. About three thousand were shipped out in all. Eighteen hundred of them sailed in a single flotilla bound for Cartagena and Caracas, the two best slave markets within reach. French officers took away their clothes and put them in loincloths so that they would pass for Africans just landed from a slaving vessel. Many had been born in the Caribbean and had served as soldiers in the French army during the revolution. One had owned six coffee plantations and a hundred slaves of his own. Bonaparte had made a point of taking rank and uniforms away from officers of colour, and this was that policy carried to its conclusion. Spanish officials at both ports understood what was being offered and would not let anyone come ashore. They then sent warnings to other governors along the coast.
Antoine RichepanceNapoleon BonaparteGuadeloupeCartagenaCaracas
Where this comes fromSource not recorded for this entry.
Sanite Belair refuses the block and is shot instead
Her sentence named her sex; she fought the executioner until they agreed to use a firing squad.
›Read the full entryClose
Sanite Belair of Verrettes married Charles Belair, an aide de camp of Toussaint Louverture and his nephew, who was made a brigadier general and given command of Arcahaie. In August 1802 the couple raised the Seventh colonial demi-brigade and most of the population of Verrettes and took to the hills of the Cahos, after the disarmings, drownings, hangings and the killing of the wives of several officers of that same demi-brigade. She was captured at Corail-Mirault. Her husband, who was not far away, surrendered so as to share her captivity. Leclerc received Dessalines's letter announcing the arrest on 12 September 1802 and appointed a commission that met six hours after the prisoners reached Cap. On 5 October 1802 that commission, four white officers and Clervaux, considered his rank and her sex and sentenced him to be shot and her to be beheaded. She fought the executioner, refused to kneel, and was shot in the end.
Rainsford argues an independent Haiti threatens nobody
An Irish officer whose life Toussaint saved writes against the tide of English opinion.
›Read the full entryClose
Captain Marcus Rainsford of the West India regiment published a thirty-page memoir in January 1802 recounting his misadventures in Santo Domingo in 1799, when a hurricane forced his ship into port, he met Toussaint, played billiards with him, was arrested as a suspected spy, condemned by a military jury and then released on Toussaint's intervention. Pierrot notes that the book ran against the grain at the moment of publication, when English opinion supported the Leclerc expedition. Rainsford argued that an independent Haiti posed no threat to British colonies, that the revolutionaries had no wish to attack them, and that the French expedition would fail for logistical and moral reasons. The mechanism of the book's limitation is that it defended Toussaint as an individual rather than the political force behind him, which is the separation Pierrot's whole argument tracks.
Marcus RainsfordToussaint LouvertureLondonSanto Domingo
Where this comes fromSource not recorded for this entry.