1806 · Haitianyear only
The state owns two thirds of the plantations and cannot work them
›Read the full entryClose
Gerlus cites the figure from Leyburn that by this year more than two thirds of the country's productive plantations belonged to the government, and pairs it with a report to the secretary of agriculture describing extensive state lands in every district plus many private domains whose owners wanted them worked on lease or on shares and needed only labourers. The combination is his central paradox. The military rulers were the largest landholders in the country and had no capital with which to buy labour. Their response was to distribute land to army officers in exchange for political loyalty and to sell small and medium farms to anyone able to pay. Haitian agriculture therefore shifted from capitalised plantations to owner-operated smallholdings, and from export crops to food grown for the household and the local market. Gerlus insists this was not planned by anyone; it was the outcome of the revolution.