rasanblaj · the timeline · the library

A proclamation in Cuba sets neighbours to watch French residents

12 March 1809 · Diaspora

The 1800sSovereignty1 source
12 March 1809 · Diaspora

A proclamation in Cuba sets neighbours to watch French residents

Committees in every town and parish decided which foreigners would be expelled.

Read the full entryClose

Napoleon Bonaparte had removed Ferdinand VII from the Spanish throne and put his own brother Joseph in his place. Spanish subjects in Cuba refused to accept the substitution, and their anger fell on the French planters and craftsmen who had settled among them after fleeing Saint-Domingue. On 12 March 1809 the Marques de Someruelos, captain general of Cuba, issued a proclamation ordering a vigilance committee in every town and every parish to look into the conduct and the opinions of the French living there and to expel anyone whose presence seemed dangerous. The committees worked fast. News of the expulsion orders reached Louisiana in April, probably carried on the same vessels as the first people driven out. Many of those expelled had already rebuilt their lives once after leaving Saint-Domingue, and among them they had established five hundred estates in eastern Cuba. They now lost a second set of properties and went looking for a third country.

Marques de SomeruelosFerdinand VIINapoleon Bonaparte CubaSantiago de CubaLouisiana
Where this comes from Lachance, P. F. (1988). The 1809 immigration of Saint-Domingue refugees to New Orleans: Reception, integration and impact. p. 112.
Permanent link to this entry

Meanwhile, and next door

1809 · Haitianyear only

Latin America's first land reform makes Haiti a nation of peasants

It also left an upper class with no way to earn without working, which it solved by taxing.

Read the full entryClose

In 1809 Alexandre Petion, ruling the southern republic after Haiti split in two, decided to break up the large estates and distribute land to his officers and soldiers. It was the first land reform in the history of Latin America. Henry Christophe in the north followed in 1819. Petion had little choice. The French market was gone, the Napoleonic wars made trade with Britain and the United States difficult, and keeping export production going with troops standing over the workers had become too expensive. Inheritance rules taken from the Napoleonic Code gave every child an equal share, so holdings subdivided in each generation until the typical farm today runs to three quarters of a hectare or less. The reform spared Haiti the pattern of huge estates beside tiny ones found across Latin America. It also left rulers who owned no working estates with one route to an income, which was taxing the peasants.

Alexandre PetionHenry Christophe Haiti
Where this comes from Source not recorded for this entry.
Permanent link to this entry
6 July 1809 · Caribbean

The French sign away Santo Domingo and property is respected

Twelve days to evacuate, ten days to emigrate, and one clause that read as slavery.

Read the full entryClose

Eleven British warships entered the harbour of Santo Domingo city on 11 May 1809. Troops came ashore on 28 June and were inside the city walls the following day under Commodore William Pryce Cumby. The capitulation was signed on 6 July. Its three signatories were Hugh Lyle Carmichael, a British major general, Juan Sanchez Ramirez for Spain, and the French commander Joseph Barquier. French troops were to give up Santo Domingo city and every other post of importance and sail for France within twelve days, British troops would hold those posts until the evacuation was complete, and a prisoner exchange was to begin at once. Anyone of any sex, condition or colour, French or Spanish, could leave for another Caribbean territory or for the United States at British expense within ten days. A further clause promised that individual and personal property of every description would be respected. In a colony where thousands of people had been classed as property, that sentence carried a second meaning.

Hugh Lyle CarmichaelJuan Sanchez RamirezJoseph BarquierWilliam Pryce Cumby Santo Domingo
Where this comes from Source not recorded for this entry.
Permanent link to this entry
1805 · Pre-Revolutionaryyear only

A British officer accuses his contemporaries of silencing Haiti

Rainsford's history opens by asking why an event that changed the world has been eclipsed.

Read the full entryClose

Marcus Rainsford's history of the revolution, the second influential British account of the event, makes an argument that Hormann finds startling. In his preface Rainsford sets out the paradox that despite the world historical transformation the revolution had wrought, it had been almost entirely eclipsed in contemporary historical discourse, and he explains the silence by the threat the event posed to the conceptual and ideological foundations of Western writing about history. Striking events that alter the condition of mankind are denied recognition by their contemporaries, he wrote, because attention is distracted by effects and because distant society recoils from anything that threatens a violation of its system or wounds a favourite prejudice. Hormann notes that Trouillot, who made the silencing of the revolution his central thesis nearly two centuries later, does not mention Rainsford at all. Where this account departs from the standard one: The chapter argues that Trouillot's thesis of comprehensive silencing is refuted by a contemporary British author who diagnosed that silencing himself, in terms close to Trouillot's own.

Marcus RainsfordMichel-Rolph Trouillot BritainHaiti
Where this comes from Source not recorded for this entry.
Permanent link to this entry

Back to the whole chronology