rasanblaj · the timeline · the library

Ardouin accuses Christophe of setting out to exterminate the mulattoes

1812 · year only · Haitian

The 1800sSovereignty1 source
1812 · Haitianyear only

Ardouin accuses Christophe of setting out to exterminate the mulattoes

The same historian insists the civil war had nothing to do with colour.

Read the full entryClose

Nicholls exposes a contradiction at the centre of the mulatto legend. Ardouin insisted that the war between the northern kingdom and the republic was caused solely by Christophe's determination to restore arbitrary government against citizens demanding constitutional checks, and that only ignorance of the facts could make anyone call it a war of colour or caste. On that point he and Madiou agreed. Yet Ardouin also argued that Christophe was in fact prejudiced against mulattoes and that in 1812 he set out to exterminate everyone in that group whose loyalty he could not be sure of. Ardouin then hedged again by noting that the king put many blacks to death as well and that opposition to him came from both groups. The mechanism Nicholls identifies is a legend that needs national unity and mulatto grievance at the same time. Where this account departs from the standard one: Nicholls shows Ardouin simultaneously denying that the civil war was about colour and charging Christophe with a campaign of extermination against mulattoes.

Beaubrun ArdouinHenri ChristopheThomas Madiou Northern Haiti
Where this comes from Nicholls, D. (1974). A work of combat: Mulatto historians and the Haitian past, 1847-1867. p. 32.in the library Where this account departs from the standard oneNicholls shows Ardouin simultaneously denying that the civil war was about colour and charging Christophe with a campaign of extermination against mulattoes.
Permanent link to this entry

Meanwhile, and next door

May 1809 to January 1810 · Diasporaspan

Nine thousand people land at New Orleans and double the city

The mayor sorted the arrivals into three legal categories of almost equal size.

Read the full entryClose

Between May 1809 and January 1810 the mayor of New Orleans counted nine thousand and fifty nine people arriving from eastern Cuba, most of them out of Santiago de Cuba and Baracoa, with only one vessel coming from Havana. Further landings in the early months of 1810 carried the total past ten thousand. The mayor sorted them into the three legal categories that had governed Saint-Domingue and that also governed Louisiana. Two thousand seven hundred and thirty one were counted as white, three thousand one hundred and two as free people of colour, and three thousand two hundred and twenty six as slaves. The three groups were almost equal in size. Orleans Parish had held seventeen thousand people in 1806. The arrivals came to more than the entire growth of the white and enslaved populations of the parish between 1806 and 1810, and they roughly doubled the population of the city itself.

James Mather New OrleansSantiago de CubaBaracoa
Where this comes from Source not recorded for this entry.
Permanent link to this entry
1812 · Caribbeanyear only

Aponte's Havana plot is the clearest case of Haitian influence

Geggus grants the example while arguing the wider influence has been overstated.

Read the full entryClose

Geggus treats the conspiracy organised in Havana by the free black carpenter José Antonio Aponte as the most striking instance of Haitian influence on slave resistance elsewhere. He is careful about the general claim. News spread wide and fast, with Jamaican slaves singing about the North Plain rising within a month, but contemporaries and historians have often exaggerated the importance of the factor. His larger irony is economic: by driving up world prices for tropical produce and creating a refugee diaspora that settled new land in Cuba, Jamaica, Louisiana and Trinidad, the revolution spread slavery to new frontiers and revived older plantation economies. Although it freed half a million people directly and more than six hundred thousand across the French colonies, and closed the slave trade's largest market, the overall volume of the Atlantic trade scarcely fell from its peak in the 1780s. Where this account departs from the standard one: Geggus argues it is difficult to believe fear of rebellion was a major factor in outlawing the slave trade, and holds that Britain abolished its trade in 1807 not from fear of West Indian revolt but because the revolution had destroyed France as a colonial rival, freeing British politicians to vote their consciences.

José Antonio Aponte CubaHavanaJamaica
Where this comes from Source not recorded for this entry.
Permanent link to this entry
1806 to 1812 · Haitianspan

Two states divide Haiti and hand out the land in opposite ways

Christophe leased the north to his generals and Petion titled the south to private owners.

Read the full entryClose

After the murder of Dessalines in 1806 Haiti split in two. Henry Christophe, born in Grenada, ruled the north with a coercive labour regime built on Toussaint's model. Alexandre Petion ran a republic in the south and west with a reputation for letting things be. The difference showed in what each did with state land. In the north the state leased its estates to dignitaries and generals. In the south it distributed them as private property, though officers and senior officials still took the largest share, and sharecropping settled in as the normal arrangement on holdings carved into two, three or five carreaux. Large estates, military strongmen and a labour code survived in both halves. Petion's lighter touch came from weakness, since he never held his generals the way Christophe held his. In 1810 Rigaud raised the south as a separate state, and it lasted until his successor rejoined Petion in 1812.

Henry ChristopheAlexandre PetionAndre Rigaud HaitiNordSud
Where this comes from Source not recorded for this entry.
Permanent link to this entry

Back to the whole chronology