A coronation in the Champ de Mars costs 150,000 dollars in regalia
April 1852 · month known · Haitian
The 1800sSovereignty1 source
April 1852 · Haitianmonth known
A coronation in the Champ de Mars costs 150,000 dollars in regalia
Sixty-five nobles created, none of them given land or income to live on.
›Read the full entryClose
The full coronation, prepared over more than two years, was held at Port-au-Prince in the Champ de Mars during April 1852, in a temporary pavilion seating seven thousand, the imperial coach was drawn by eight American greys, the court dressed in the style of Louis XIV, and Soulouque crowned himself and then the empress in imitation of Napoleon, with foreign observers estimating a hundred and fifty thousand dollars spent on the regalia. Baur identifies the flaw in the mechanism. Six princes and fifty-nine dukes, marquises and barons were created to repay followers and mimic the courts of Europe, but the new nobility received no lands and no emoluments, so foreign visitors reported duchesses selling fruit in the market and princes taking in tailoring. The emperor answered their complaints by granting armorial bearings with mottoes praising himself.
Empress AdelinaFaustin SoulouqueChamp de MarsPort-au-Prince
Fifty years on, Beard finds Haitian history already needs recovering
Beard writes because the only English memoir of Toussaint has long been out of print.
›Read the full entryClose
Pierrot follows the story into the middle of the century, when the Reverend John Relly Beard published his life of Toussaint in 1853 and a second book in 1863. Beard emphasised his subject's racial purity, wanting it marked that he was wholly without white blood, while also asserting that the negro race was inferior to the highest style of man and that the race at large had as yet no history. He praised Toussaint for proclaiming the doctrine of free trade, and disparaged Dessalines, the man who actually liberated Haiti, as a monster cruel by nature. The mechanism Pierrot draws out is the introduction's admission that no detailed life was accessible to English readers because the only existing memoir had long been out of print. Rainsford's account was out of print in 1853 and still is.
Gezo tells a British envoy that captured prisoners are his whole revenue
Britain wanted palm oil grown instead. He answered that his women were soldiers.
›Read the full entryClose
Britain had outlawed the slave trade and spent the middle of the nineteenth century sending envoys to Dahomey to press the kingdom into banning exports and growing palm oil instead. Lieutenant Frederick Forbes recorded a meeting with King Gezo on 4 July 1850. Gezo told him that his nation was a military one, women included, that his income came from selling prisoners of war, and that he could not put his women into the fields because it would kill them. Everyone in the country, he said, was a soldier, and the trade fed them. The argument that Europeans had themselves supplied, that captives who were not sold would be sacrificed instead, had by the 1860s been picked up by the Dahomian court and used back at the British. If he did not sell them, one king pointed out, he would have to kill them, which England would like even less.
A New York paper stresses Dominican blackness to stop United States recognition
A rival writer answered by shrinking the African share of the same population.
›Read the full entryClose
The New York Evening Post of 2 September 1854 drew attention to the blackness of Dominicans in order to raise antipathy against them among sections of opinion in the United States. The object was to undermine a plan by the Secretary of State, William L. Marcy, to have Washington formally recognise the Dominican Republic. Shortly afterwards a writer working for the opposite result set out to shrink the black element of the same population, describing Dominicans as made up of Spaniards, Spanish creoles and some Africans and people of colour. The exchange shows a country with dozens of overlapping colour categories being handled by a country that recognised two. Dominicans have had to negotiate the racial paradigms of their North American and European overseers, and on this occasion both governments had reasons of their own to prefer the version that made the Dominican Republic white. In Dominican usage the word indio still commonly stands where black would apply, and black is reserved for Haitians and Africans.
William L. MarcyNew YorkDominican RepublicWashington
Where this comes fromSource not recorded for this entry.