1914 · Haitianyear only
Haiti twice refuses to sign away control of its customs revenue
›Read the full entryClose
The first of the three points in Johnson's published report was chronological. Twice during 1914, before the killing that supplied the official justification, the American government pressed Haiti to accept what it called peaceable intervention, asking the Haitian government to sign a convention placing Haitian finances under American control on the model already applied in Santo Domingo. The Haitian government refused the terms both times. Pamphile presents this as the evidence that dismantles the benevolence narrative, because it shows an American objective already fixed and already rejected. When the violence of July 1915 came, it supplied what Johnson called the long awaited opportunity, and the intervention that followed secured more than the original demand: not only the finances but the country's military forces as well. Johnson's second point named the interested party, Roger L. Farnham of the National City Bank of New York, whose bank controlled the Banque Nationale and through it the Haitian economy. Where this account departs from the standard one: Against the official account that the marines landed to restore order, Pamphile follows Johnson in dating American designs on Haitian finances to 1914 and treating 1915 as the opportunity rather than the cause.