rasanblaj · the timeline · the library

Hudicourt reviews the state of Haitian democracy and finds none

January 1926 · month known · Haitian

The 1900sSezisman1 source
January 1926 · Haitianmonth known

Hudicourt reviews the state of Haitian democracy and finds none

He argued that the occupation had built no democratic institution any Haitian could use.

Read the full entryClose

In January 1926 Max Hudicourt published an assessment of the state of democracy in Haiti in La Nouvelle Ronde. His conclusion was that eleven years of American rule had produced no genuinely democratic institution anywhere in Haiti. The evidence lay in plain view. No legislative elections had been held since 1917. The president was chosen by a Conseil d'Etat he appointed himself. The constitution in force had been drafted in Washington and ratified in a plebiscite the marines supervised. Newspapers were prosecuted under a preventive detention law. The occupation's own justification was that it was training Haitians in self government, and Hudicourt was pointing out that the training had produced no institution any Haitian could actually use. He was nineteen when he wrote it. He went on to help found the Haitian Communist Party, sat in the Senate after the occupation ended, and was shot dead in Port-au-Prince in 1947. The review essays of these student journals were first drafts of the next thirty years of Haitian politics.

Max Hudicourt HaitiPort-au-PrinceWashington
Where this comes from Nicholls, D. (1996). From Dessalines to Duvalier. Rutgers University Press. p. 300.
Permanent link to this entry

Meanwhile, and next door

1920 to 1939 · Diasporaspan

Cotton falls from thirty five cents to sixteen and stays down for twenty years

American farm prices collapsed after the armistice and did not recover until the next war.

Read the full entryClose

American farmers had ploughed marginal land and bought tractors to feed the world during the war. The number of motor vehicles on farms multiplied fivefold in the war years to about eighty five thousand, and by the end of the 1920s nearly a million farmers were driving them. Nine million work animals were slaughtered as machines replaced them, releasing thirty million acres of pasture for wheat, cotton and dairying. When world production returned to its normal channels after the armistice of November 1918, the surplus had nowhere to go. Cotton fell from a wartime high of thirty five cents a pound to sixteen cents in 1920. Corn fell from a dollar and a half a bushel to fifty two cents, wool from nearly sixty cents a pound to under twenty. Prices improved a little after 1921 and did not recover fully until war returned in 1939. Foreclosures rose and owners became tenants.

United States
Where this comes from Source not recorded for this entry.
Permanent link to this entry
1920s to 1930s · Africanspan

Miners' contracts lengthen and Africa gets an urban working class

Johannesburg, Lagos, Leopoldville, Nairobi and Salisbury all filled up in the same two decades.

Read the full entryClose

Competition for work and for access to the colonial economy hardened ethnic identity, because solidarity in a scramble means sorting people into groups and caricaturing the ones you are outside. The mines had begun with migrant labour: men on short contracts who came from the countryside, took the wages and went home, described as urban tribesmen raiding the industrial economy. From the 1920s the contracts lengthened and companies settled workers with their families near the shafts, which produced a permanent urban working class. Johannesburg was the largest case, built on gold. Lagos, Leopoldville, Nairobi and Salisbury grew through the same years on people walking in from the countryside. Reid calls this migration the most important single theme in Africa's modern social history. New arrivals kept village ties and rebuilt rural custom in town, and competition kept ethnic loyalty useful. The towns also mixed everyone together, and intermarriage and shared work produced urban cultures of their own. Women found in them some distance from the authority of the homestead.

African migrant workers JohannesburgLagosLeopoldvilleNairobiSalisbury
Where this comes from Source not recorded for this entry.
Permanent link to this entry
17 October 1928 · Caribbean

Dominica gets a Peasant Information Bureau and a planter to run it

The growers' association excluded the growers from its own meetings.

Read the full entryClose

Sir Francis Watts reported on agricultural conditions in Dominica in 1927 and recommended a Peasant Information Bureau under an appointed Peasant Adviser, charged with supervising the cultivation and export of crops grown by small proprietors. The bureau opened the following year and one of the island's most prominent planters, J. C. MacIntyre, took the post of Adviser under the local executive. On 17 October 1928 the administrator asked the Colonial Office for permission to move five hundred pounds from Loan Board funds to the bureau to set up a Vegetables Growers Association. It was granted. MacIntyre drafted the by laws himself. The associates would be the peasants, whom he described as more or less illiterate and whose attendance at meetings he called undesirable; they would be represented by the heads of their local centres, and the Adviser would sit as chairman, treasurer and secretary at once. Ninety years after abolition the word peasant was finally respectable in Dominica, and the first institution built around it kept a planter at its head.

Francis WattsJ. C. MacIntyre Dominica
Where this comes from Source not recorded for this entry.
Permanent link to this entry

Back to the whole chronology