the mid twentieth century · Haitianapproximate
Hurbon reads Vodou as the quiet refusal of the Haitian majority
›Read the full entryClose
Laennec Hurbon and Dany Bebel-Gisler set Haitian Vodou beside the practice of Islam in colonial Algeria and argued that the two perform the same work. French administration in Algeria treated Islam as backwardness to be managed, and Algerians held to it in part because holding to it was the one refusal available to people with no political rights. Hurbon reads the religion of the Haitian countryside the same way. A peasantry shut out of the state, the schools, the language of government and the terms of the export economy kept a system of belief the elite despised, and the keeping of it was itself a position. Vodou in this account is refusal conducted without speeches, directed at cultural domination from outside and at an economy built on dependence. The reading earns its place because the Haitian state spent much of its history trying to stamp the religion out, from the rural codes of the nineteenth century to the anti superstition campaign of 1941, and never managed it.