2009 · Haitianyear only
Geggus argues Vodou and marronage did little for the revolution
›Read the full entryClose
Joseph reports a set of claims that remain contested. In the collection assembled from a conference held at the John Carter Brown Library in 2004 for Haiti's bicentennial and published in 2009, David Geggus restates positions from his earlier work. He holds that the indigenous religion played a minor role in the revolution's success, against Fouchard, Laguerre, Hurbon, Dubois, Fick and Price-Mars; he downplays maroon resistance as an influence, finding it unhelpful to Haitian independence; he maintains that despite the connections between marronage and earlier uprisings documented by Fouchard, no large-scale revolts or conspiracies by the enslaved existed before the general revolt of 1791; and he rejects the consensus about conditions after 1750. Joseph calls these issues controversial and urges further research. In the same volume Carolyn Fick argues the African-born supplied grassroots leadership at every stage, especially in the war of independence of 1802 and 1803. Where this account departs from the standard one: Records Geggus denying that Vodou and marronage were significant causes of the revolution and denying any large-scale slave revolt before 1791, against the dominant Haitian scholarship.