rasanblaj · the timeline · the library

Cameroon came into the trade last and left it late

1658 to 1838 · span · African

The 1600sMaafa1 source
1658 to 1838 · Africanspan

Cameroon came into the trade last and left it late

Regular departures began in the 1760s and Brazilian ships kept the route open for decades.

Read the full entryClose

Cameroon was the smallest of the significant embarkation points in the Bight of Biafra and the last of them to enter the trade in any volume. Apart from a single early voyage, regular departures only began in the 1760s, at the point when Atlantic slaving as a whole was approaching its historical peak. The busiest years came in the early 1770s, when about two thousand people a year were recorded leaving the region. British traders ran the traffic until 1808. After Britain withdrew, Brazilian merchants took over most of what was left, and the captives they bought came largely from the Cameroon Highlands well inland. The route stayed open into the 1830s, decades after every major power had outlawed the trade on paper. A port that opened late outlasted the ports that opened first, because the last buyers standing were the ones furthest from any navy willing to stop them.

British tradersBrazilian merchants CameroonCameroon HighlandsBight of BiafraBrazil
Where this comes from Eltis, D., & Richardson, D. (2010). Atlas of the transatlantic slave trade. Yale University Press. p. 132.HT-ATST-000161

A code like HT-WIB-000044 is a bates number. It marks one page of our stamped scan of the book, so the same page can be found again by anyone working from the same copy. Open one to see every entry drawn from that page.

Permanent link to this entry

Meanwhile, and next door

1758 · Pre-Revolutionaryyear only

Makandal leaps out of the fire in front of the church at Cap-Francais

He was caught again and executed, and the crowd went on telling the first version.

Read the full entryClose

Arrested in 1758 and sentenced to burn, Makandal was taken to the square in front of the church at Cap-Francais. Accounts agree that he got clear of the flames, in front of a crowd that had come to watch him die. He was retaken and executed shortly afterwards. What the colony remembered was the leap. Haitian painters have returned to the scene since, showing the rebellious slave with magical powers astonishing the spectators, and the episode went on troubling masters and administrators for years after the man himself was ash. For the enslaved population the reading was straightforward: fire did not hold him, so the power he claimed was real, and the authorities that had promised a public death had failed to deliver one in front of witnesses. Executions are performed in order to be seen. This one was seen, and it taught the opposite of what it was staged to teach.

Francois Makandal Cap-FrancaisSaint-Domingue
Where this comes from Source not recorded for this entry.
Permanent link to this entry
1835 · Haitianyear only

The penal code files Vodou under superstitions and makes it punishable

Fines and prison for anyone who made a zombie or cast a spell, on the statute book for generations.

Read the full entryClose

Jean-Pierre Boyer governed Haiti from 1818 to 1843. He is remembered for two pieces of legislation. The rural code of 1826 tied the Haitian peasant to a marginal existence and went on doing so long after his fall. The penal code of 1835 placed Vodou under the heading of superstitions and made its practice illegal, punishable by fine and imprisonment. One article specifically exacted fines and prison from anyone who made zombies or cast spells, which meant the state had written a belief about the dead into its criminal law and then undertaken to prosecute people under it. Practitioners responded the way people respond to that: they went further into secrecy, and priests surrounded their worship with mystery and with a reputation for power. Both effects outlasted Boyer by more than a century, and the sensational literature about Haiti drew much of its raw material from the court cases the article produced.

Jean-Pierre Boyer Haiti
Where this comes from Source not recorded for this entry.
Permanent link to this entry
23 March 1668 · Caribbean

A Barbados treaty asks the Caribs to hand back runaways

St Vincent agreed on paper to return escapees and then kept them instead.

Read the full entryClose

On 23 March 1668 William Willoughby, governor of Barbados, concluded a treaty with several Carib captains of St Vincent. The island lies directly upwind of Barbados, so a boat pushed off from the sugar plantations there would come ashore on the Vincentian coast with almost no steering required. Enslaved people had worked this out. The treaty obliged the Caribs to seize and deliver up anyone arriving as a fugitive from Barbados or any other English island, and to acknowledge themselves subjects of the English king. In return the English would leave them St Vincent and St Lucia. The Caribs honoured none of it. Thirty two years later the missionary Jean Baptiste Labat found a great number of escaped Africans living on the island, and recorded that the Caribs had stopped selling such people back and now treated them as members of one nation with themselves. The refuge the treaty was written to close stayed open for another century.

William WilloughbyCaribs of St VincentJean Baptiste Labat St VincentBarbadosSt Lucia
Where this comes from Source not recorded for this entry.
Permanent link to this entry

Back to the whole chronology