1791 · Haitianyear only
The great rising began among creoles, not the newly landed Africans
›Read the full entryClose
Saint-Domingue's slave trade grew steeply between 1785 and 1790, which makes it tempting to explain the 1791 revolt as the arithmetic result of mass African arrivals. Geggus refuses the inference. The revolt began in the most creolised district of the colony and its leadership came largely from people born locally, while the most heavily African districts were the last to join the revolution. He accepts that elsewhere the correlation between heavy slave imports and rebellion holds, in Bahia, in central Brazil and in Cuba after 1795, but he points to the British colonies as a counter case, where three late rebellions on creolised ground, Barbados in 1816, Demerara in 1823 and Jamaica in 1831, undermine any attempt to tie revolt to a recent African presence. The same reasoning explains why Curacao's two large risings occurred when its enslaved population was already thoroughly creolised. Where this account departs from the standard one: Against demographic explanations of the Haitian Revolution, Geggus insists the revolt started in the most creolised zone and that African districts joined last.