A bishop arrives from France and Louverture refuses to know him
March 1801 · month known · Pre-Revolutionary
The 1800sThe Great Reclamation1 source
March 1801 · Pre-Revolutionarymonth known
A bishop arrives from France and Louverture refuses to know him
Only priests the governor picks himself will be recognised, a rule he then writes into law.
›Read the full entryClose
When a bishop arrived from France, Louverture declined to recognise him because he had not chosen the man personally, and in his constitution he reserved to himself the right to appoint colonial priests. Girard sets this beside the ban on the night-long possession rites, which he says had solid political grounds given the association between those rites and the revolt of 1791. Religion in this account is an instrument of control, kept firmly under the governor's hand. Girard declines to settle whether the Catholicism was sincere, noting that critics called the piety a facade at odds with his sexual life and his political record, that one modern biographer thinks he privately worshipped the persecuted religion, and that switching between the two according to circumstance is a recognisable pattern rather than hypocrisy.
Where this comes fromGirard, P. R. (2011). The slaves who defeated Napoléon: Toussaint Louverture and the Haitian War of Independence, 1801-1804. University of Alabama Press. p. 23.in the library
Prisoners are stripped of their uniforms and dressed as new arrivals
Spanish officials at Cartagena and Caracas saw through the disguise and turned the ships away.
›Read the full entryClose
In July 1802 the French general Antoine Richepance began deporting the people he had captured while retaking Guadeloupe for Napoleon Bonaparte. About three thousand were shipped out in all. Eighteen hundred of them sailed in a single flotilla bound for Cartagena and Caracas, the two best slave markets within reach. French officers took away their clothes and put them in loincloths so that they would pass for Africans just landed from a slaving vessel. Many had been born in the Caribbean and had served as soldiers in the French army during the revolution. One had owned six coffee plantations and a hundred slaves of his own. Bonaparte had made a point of taking rank and uniforms away from officers of colour, and this was that policy carried to its conclusion. Spanish officials at both ports understood what was being offered and would not let anyone come ashore. They then sent warnings to other governors along the coast.
Antoine RichepanceNapoleon BonaparteGuadeloupeCartagenaCaracas
Where this comes fromSource not recorded for this entry.
Sanite Belair refuses the blindfold and refuses the block
The court sentenced her husband to be shot and her, because of her sex, to be beheaded.
›Read the full entryClose
Sanite Belair, a young free woman from Verrettes, married Charles Belair in 1796 or 1797. He was Toussaint Louverture's nephew and aide de camp. In 1802 he took up arms against the Leclerc expedition from the heights of the Matheux, and held out there for more than two months. Sanite worked at pulling the scattered insurgent forces together and was said by some to be the soul of the conspiracy. Captured in a surprise attack at Corail Mirrault while her husband was away looking for ammunition, she was taken prisoner, and he surrendered rather than leave her. Dessalines, then serving the French, sent the pair to Leclerc with a letter accusing them. The court sentenced Charles to be shot and Sanite, on account of her sex, to be beheaded. On 5 October 1802 she demanded and was granted a soldier's death by firing squad, refused the blindfold, and could not be forced to the block.
Sanite BelairCharles BelairJean Jacques DessalinesCharles LeclercCap FrancaisMatheuxVerrettes
Where this comes fromSource not recorded for this entry.
Rainsford argues an independent Haiti threatens nobody
An Irish officer whose life Toussaint saved writes against the tide of English opinion.
›Read the full entryClose
Captain Marcus Rainsford of the West India regiment published a thirty-page memoir in January 1802 recounting his misadventures in Santo Domingo in 1799, when a hurricane forced his ship into port, he met Toussaint, played billiards with him, was arrested as a suspected spy, condemned by a military jury and then released on Toussaint's intervention. Pierrot notes that the book ran against the grain at the moment of publication, when English opinion supported the Leclerc expedition. Rainsford argued that an independent Haiti posed no threat to British colonies, that the revolutionaries had no wish to attack them, and that the French expedition would fail for logistical and moral reasons. The mechanism of the book's limitation is that it defended Toussaint as an individual rather than the political force behind him, which is the separation Pierrot's whole argument tracks.
Marcus RainsfordToussaint LouvertureLondonSanto Domingo
Where this comes fromSource not recorded for this entry.