rasanblaj · the timeline · the library

Where the relief dollar went after the earthquake

2010 · year only · Haitian

The 2000sDechoukaj1 source
2010 · Haitianyear only

Where the relief dollar went after the earthquake

Three per cent to the elected government, sixty four per cent to eleven thousand organisations.

Read the full entryClose

Bellegarde-Smith sets out the arithmetic of the response to the earthquake of 12 January 2010. Of every American dollar spent by the United States, thirty three per cent went to sustaining the thirty thousand or so troops who arrived in Haiti without being invited, and about three per cent went to the elected Haitian government. The remaining sixty four per cent went to roughly eleven thousand non governmental organisations working inside a national territory of ten thousand seven hundred and fifty square miles. Three quarters of Canadian relief money, he reports, was spent with Canadian firms in Canada. The concentration of such organisations in Haiti was the highest anywhere in the world. His argument is that they crowd out the building of state structures and national institutions, and that the small share reaching the government then confirms the belief that no Haitian government can be trusted with anything. He calls the result a steady bleeding of public capacity for private benefit.

HaitiUnited StatesCanada
Where this comes from Bellegarde-Smith, P. (2011). A man-made disaster: The earthquake of January 12, 2010, a Haitian perspective. p. 266.
Permanent link to this entry

Meanwhile, and next door

2007 · Caribbeanyear only

A pink register divides children born in the same hospital

A document that is not citizenship, and a circular that took citizenship back.

Read the full entryClose

In 2007 the Dominican electoral board created a separate civil register for foreigners, known as the Book of Foreigners or the pink registers. A child born in a Dominican hospital to parents who cannot show legal status is given a pink birth certificate and entered in that book. It is a document, and it is not citizenship: people registered in it cannot vote. In the same year the board issued a circular, also called Resolution 12, instructing registry officers to stop issuing identity papers to children of foreign parents whose births had been recorded irregularly. Adults who needed their own birth certificates to enrol at a university found them refused. Whether a father had used a ficha, the identity card handed out by a sugar mill, to register a birth years earlier became the mark that flagged a family. Thousands of people born in the country were left stateless while officials audited their papers.

Dominican Republic
Where this comes from Source not recorded for this entry.
Permanent link to this entry
1960s to 2010s · Africanspan

African debt runs from 9 billion dollars in 1970 to 321 billion in 1997

Aid of twelve billion a year bought the donors a voice in how sovereign states were run.

Read the full entryClose

The debt began with loans taken in the 1960s and 1970s for projects that never paid, and compounded when governments borrowed again to service what they already owed. Export prices fell, terms of trade worsened, and states lost the revenue to run themselves. Africa's total debt went from 9 billion dollars in 1970 to 321 billion by 1997, and interest on unpaid arrears took a growing share of national output that would otherwise have gone to schools and clinics. Western aid averaging 12 billion dollars a year through the 1990s was a stopgap, and it gave the donors an unprecedented voice in the internal policy of sovereign countries. The money came with conditions attached: liberalise, privatise, cut state spending on health and education. The campaign to cancel the debt was the newest in a line of public causes that began with the movement to abolish the slave trade, and like the missionary appeals of the nineteenth century it treated the continent as a condition to be corrected.

World BankInternational Monetary FundOxfamUNICEF Africa
Where this comes from Source not recorded for this entry.
Permanent link to this entry
1983 to 2013 · Indigenousspan

Small islands were settled because the sea fed people, not the land

A village worked a catchment of five kilometres, which an island of five square kilometres supplies.

Read the full entryClose

Archaeologists long assumed that the first settlers of the Caribbean preferred the larger islands, reasoning that a small island holds fewer animals and less ground to farm. The excavated evidence does not support that. Land animals were never a large part of the diet in these islands. The food came from the sea, and many small islands sit on banks more productive than the water around their bigger neighbours. Saba is one of them. A village of this period worked a catchment of about five kilometres around itself, which an island of five square kilometres supplies without difficulty. Once that is understood, the distribution of Early Ceramic Age sites stops being puzzling. Settlements turn up on islands that earlier scholars had dismissed as too small to hold anyone permanently, because the calculation was being made from the land rather than from the water. People who lived by sailing between islands did not measure them the way people who live on continents do.

SabaCaribbeanLesser Antilles
Where this comes from Source not recorded for this entry.
Permanent link to this entry

Back to the whole chronology