Thomas dates uncontested control of the island to 1797

Thomas opens with the position he wants to explain, that by 1797 Toussaint's authority over the island was essentially uncontested: he had expelled the French agent Hedouville without a fight, was independently negotiating the British withdrawal, had instituted his own agrarian policies and was restoring commercial standing on his own terms. That compressed list is the premise for the article's central question, which is why a leader in that position declined to declare independence when a declaration would have gratified his base, legitimised the struggle and strengthened his diplomatic hand. The mechanism Thomas will propose is calculated dependence. Readers should note that Hedouville did not reach the colony until 1798 and left in October of that year, so the article's own dating of the expulsion is a year early. The slip matters because the article's whole case turns on sequence. Where this account departs from the standard one: Thomas places the expulsion of Hedouville in or before 1797, whereas the agent arrived in the colony in 1798 and left in October of that year.

The colonial jurist Moreau de Saint-Mery set out a scale of eleven colour classes for Saint-Domingue. Pure white and pure black each stood at one hundred and twenty eight parts. The sacatra carried sixteen white parts, the griffe thirty two, the marabou forty eight, the mulatto sixty four, the quarteron ninety six, the metif one hundred and twelve, the mameluc one hundred and twenty, the quarteronne one hundred and twenty four, the sang mele one hundred and twenty six. Anyone with fewer than eight white parts was a negro. The scale ran one way only. Any recorded black ancestry kept a person out of the white category permanently. Moreau also counted how many parental combinations could produce each rank, twenty for the quarteron, twelve for the mulatto, none at all for the two extremes. He observed that children came out in places his arithmetic had not predicted, and he observed in passing that the eye of prejudice did the sorting.

News of the French takeover of the Dutch Republic and the creation of the Batavian Republic had already been part of Tula's argument the previous year. In 1796 it worked its way through the colonial administration. The ancien régime governor Johannes de Veer withdrew and was replaced by a politically colourless local bureaucrat, Jan Jacob Beaujon, who was in turn replaced by an apparently more outspoken pro-French Patriot, Johann Rudolf Lauffer, all within the same year. Oostindie stresses that this reshuffle reflected dynamics inside the white elite, between Orangists and Patriots but also within Patriot circles, over questions that came down to trade and economic interest. Sections of the free coloured population had their own stake in the 1796 power games, mainly better representation in local politics, and there is evidence of open and sometimes violent free coloured protest, but no sign of organised cross-colour action aiming at radical change.

Naval war with Britain had destroyed the French merchant fleet, leaving Saint-Domingue dependent on American shipping, so when Congress embargoed French colonies in retaliation for privateering the colony's export economy stopped. Louverture wrote to Adams expressing surprise and sadness that American vessels had abandoned his ports, and sent Joseph Bunel to carry the letter and argue the case. Girard notes that Louverture staffed his civil administration almost entirely with white secretaries, priests, merchants and clerks, since Black and mixed-race men dominated the army, and that sending a white envoy to a slaveholding republic was ordinary politics rather than an anomaly. Bunel met Secretary of State Pickering and a congressional delegation from South Carolina, then dined with Adams. Pickering, describing the mission in his correspondence, identified Louverture as the Black commander in chief and called Bunel merely a messenger, saying nothing of his colour.